Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain

ehird on Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:33:48 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
From: ehird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:33:39 +0100
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0810101017ned2192fj6f10d643914e71c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0810091541120.4101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810091628h2f92bf29y8ca685b19aa5bebe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810092030h312f9b4cte8984cabc29a2891@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810092039s31706999t39b3157e965334a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48EED6AA.3050904@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810092117o17263b00yd26c3696fe0175e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810101017ned2192fj6f10d643914e71c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 10 Oct 2008, at 18:17, Tyler wrote:

> Can't it just be a word in itself, as in "this is a nomic?"

I imagine "a nomic" was intended, yes.

-- 
ehird

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] C Nomic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread