Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back

Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:10:35 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:10:28 -0400
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0810091634o4208c5b6v5336f6d3aa595375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48EE753C.6000807@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810091634o4208c5b6v5336f6d3aa595375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I Object to the tidiness list on the grounds that "fooware" is spelled
> correctly. (It's part of our history, and cannot be replaced!) But go ahead
> and try again substituting the Rule 0 fix; there aren't any restrictions on
> that.

A typo 7 months ago is "part of our history" worth holding on to?
You're talking about a nomic that repealed winning conditions.


-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back
  - From: 0x44

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Not In Vain
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] I'm back
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread