Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam

ehird on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:57:01 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
From: ehird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:56:41 +0100
In-reply-to: <48EE613E.2080809@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <7B342B03-6346-4C30-9A19-9040E400DD19@xxxxxxxxx> <653283240810091213u4c924f2em4e7f933373594558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <24C65CEF-8601-465D-A93A-DC5E37BD08F5@xxxxxxxxx> <653283240810091219h223cb81fx610c27393c698754@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810091230y5f1521f8ic3c35e65e4b96311@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DFF941CC-B97B-4A34-B0A4-15CEE5B43180@xxxxxxxxx> <48EE5FD6.3010409@xxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810091250y47010b26vc62d037065c54dea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48EE613E.2080809@xxxxxxxxx>

On 9 Oct 2008, at 20:53, Phil Ulrich wrote:

> Maybe usable wasn't the word I meant. Practical?

Practical is no requirement.

-- 
ehird

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- [s-d] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: ehird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: ehird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: ehird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: Phil Ulrich
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
  - From: Phil Ulrich

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A Perfectly Good Scam
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread