Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract

Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 9 Oct 2008 11:53:20 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 14:53:14 -0400
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0810091015t1137a8d6v84311acd79cd34c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840810081635p4e00f5e8ib551a80b340ee968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240810081639o3bbd6503sf1bed297bb3c19b6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810091015t1137a8d6v84311acd79cd34c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I cause the below Consultation to be ZOTTED. I don't see officers in the
> contract so it's obviously invalid. He never specified that the contract was
> at the other end of the link, so the link is the attempted contract,
> apparently.

I Usurp the Ministry of Questions, specifying a Retainer of 1.
Zotting consultations because you think the answer is obvious is
counterproductive.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] At 00:01 UTC, I publish the following Ballot, change the clock to be on, and vote as follows:
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] OCB Trick - nday 9, nweek 149
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] New Contract
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread