Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language

Jay Campbell on Sat, 4 Oct 2008 12:05:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 12:05:31 -0700
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650810041145q5d85e2d8va9656fc9f3f45e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48E6EBDF.1080205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E75EEB.9080009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E7B569.5040904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810041145q5d85e2d8va9656fc9f3f45e6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

>
> Their rationale: the rules don't say I can't. 

This probably keeps happening because so many nomic rulesets contain the 
"anything not illegal is permitted" clause.

j
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Inflationary Language
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread