Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposaleering

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey, you're right! Good point. I'm all for it then. Does this mean a bunch
more Rules that claim not to change the gamestate in the future? Maybe they
should be kept in the one rule, with sections for each major addition.

On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:04 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > What I want to know, however, is if this 'rule', if passed, could force
> > people to choose between allegiance to Agora and allegiance to B Nomic.
> It
> > seems like Agora could make a rule that the new partnership has to, I
> don't
> > know, forsake all non-Agoran currency, so the Opted in will have to
> either
> > give away their mack (and create/vote for proposals to remove mack in
> > general) or be punished in Agora. Just an example. Is it reasonable to
> > assume such implications are possible?
>
> Agora can already make a rule that all players of B Nomic must forsake
> all non-Agoran currency or else be punished in Agora. Essentially,
> this rule just means that people who take responsibility for B's
> behavior are responsible (in Agora) for B's behavior, and that B is a
> person in Agora.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>  _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss