Justin Ahmann on Sat, 13 Sep 2008 15:51:03 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Corporate tomfoolery


The RecursionCorp Contract states that its Officer is a party.
 
Codae



----- Original Message ----
From: Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>
To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 6:49:05 PM
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Corporate tomfoolery

No, non-parties can be officers, if I recollect correctly. I'm trying to see
how Codae is still the officer now...

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> But Codae's no longer a party, e.g. cannot be the officer, right?
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Elliott Hird <
> penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > 2008/9/13 Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > > Ok, so as officer of RecursionCorp, 0x44 owes Codae the Corporation's
> m2.
> > > Big deal, right?
> >
> > Codae is the officer, read carefully.
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
-Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss