Re: [s-d] Now that murder has been repealed...

["Geoffrey Spear" <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thing is the rule
> does not say WHOSE macks the felon can destroy, ergo he is obligated and
> able to destroy whatever macks he wants up to the amount of the fine.

I don't see where you'd get that "able" from anywhere in the rules,
and Rule 4E2 would seem to explicitly make it impossible to destroy
something unless another rule allows it.  No rule I can see authorizes
anyone to destroy mackerel, and Rule 4E73 was probably influenced by
Agora's rules that actually allow the destruction of currency.  In any
event, 4E54 and 4E73 conflict; 4E54 says mackerel is deducted for a
fine, while 4E73 creates an obligation that's impossible to fulfill.

-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss