Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?

Jay Campbell on Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:42:18 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:42:10 -0700
In-reply-to: <285c99840806272334w6aa7c1a4ybb64651da6b11fe4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4862809E.40602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <784a579e0806251040w59a75e1ak881a6a21301b404f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1de9d4fc0806272317t6991f510n955acec1b706a74e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840806272334w6aa7c1a4ybb64651da6b11fe4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)

> I'd rather start the fifth era than start C Nomic

Yah - what's wrong with B that couldn't be fixed via proposal?

I, for one, am in favor of marching on.

But what is the status of the last round of proposals - is the current 
posted ruleset correct or is it pending update?


_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: David E. Smith
- Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] C-Nomic anyone?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread