Re: [s-d] [s-b] OCB LLC

[Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> That was the intention. If that language would cause you to support it
>> I'll resubmit.
>>
>> Charles Schaefer wrote:
>>     
>>> Is he obligated to fulfill the bribe?
>>>
>>>       
>
> Can't. OCB LLC is a contract. The rules take precedence of it and
> require random weighted selection of tricks.
>   

It says "no Player may cause the Beast to perform a Trick as a Game 
Action" which arguably isn't the case if the Contract is causing the 
Beast to do it. If indirect actions do count, then voting for a proposal 
that allows alteration of hitpoints is complicity to felony. How sheer 
is that corporate veil?



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss