Re: [s-d] [s-b] As Minister of Change, I publish the following ballot and turn the clock on.

["Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hmm...

If we vote down 441, you'll tell us what this "Nuclear Option" is *someday*.
If we vote FOR 441 (as we have been doing), it will be *swift*.

I encourage people to keep voting for 441, because I am impatient and I want
to know what BP is up to.

2008/6/2, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I don't see how this would invalidate your current votes. This doesn't
> > go back and hold all past criminals responsible. It only effects
> > punishments issued AFTER the rule goes into effect.
>
>
> Perhaps you are correct, Sir. This means that you all leave me no choice.
>
> --- THE NUCLEAR OPTION* ---
>
> I will not enter into details about the Nuclear Option at this moment in
> time**. (Indeed, I can't...) I simply wish to ensure that every last one of
> you receives due notice before I have recourse to it.
>
> Should Proposal 0441 Pass, my retaliation will be swift and none will be
> spared.
>
> Think about this very carefully. I do not wish to use the Nuclear Option,
> though I will if made to do so. I am warning you simply because I think
> that
> using the Nuclear Option without prior notice would be tremendously unfair
> to certain participants.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
>
> *Really, this is not a bluff. I am 100% serious.
> **If not forced to exercise the Option, I will someday (when this whole
> "Murder" thing is sorted out) reveal its functioning, for your
> shock-and-awed appreciation.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss