Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection

Charles Schaefer on Fri, 16 May 2008 12:21:56 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
From: "Charles Schaefer" <chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 12:21:51 -0700
In-reply-to: <cf0c2a990805161214p10d46252h741e9b84c0169f2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <285c99840805160627v27eb4534w678bdd1630e32f8d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990805160707i574aebbao1ec10cf1cbe252cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805160718m7e9c4a8foded393a7271430b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0805160738x5d940404p15263e636715bb7b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <482D9D0A.4040408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990805160748g5d4f23bbla48460da1cc29ff8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805161151t686ea74qa5f07783c6562c09@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990805161152m5077d72dle79cda4ec83d148c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <482DDA2F.5090401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990805161214p10d46252h741e9b84c0169f2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

2008/5/16, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > A contract shouldn't have to be immediately executable to be valid. A
> > list of joinable contracts with zero or one current parties would be
> useful.
>
> Making the MoB track contracts with 0 parties probably would invite
> spamming, though.

If people start submitting spam contracts, we can just charge them fines
under the anti-spamming rules.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] miner forty niner
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread