| Jay Campbell on Fri, 16 May 2008 12:00:15 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Without Objection |
A contract shouldn't have to be immediately executable to be valid. A list of joinable contracts with zero or one current parties would be useful. Mike McGann wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> How about this. Contracts work like the new support mechanism. You >> announce your intention to create a contract and the action can only >> be performed after one party has agreed to become a party to the >> contract. >> > > That was supposed to read "after one other party has agreed" > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss