Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM

Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 15 May 2008 09:20:45 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 12:20:39 -0400
In-reply-to: <285c99840805150857t6653b47aocc233932c97c84b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <44e5a2650805141806o391e90a8j8c2a33004909bb74@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840805150857t6653b47aocc233932c97c84b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Charles Schaefer
<chuckles11489@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 4. I am clearly insane. Why else would I stab the submitter of this Quorum
> and call it a "mitigating circumstance"?

We don't currently have an insanity defense in our rules.  I'll
happily support a proposal to add one, though.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Pork Barrel
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] QUORUM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread