Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Tweaks

Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 1 May 2008 05:28:44 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Tweaks

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: Tweaks
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 08:28:35 -0400
In-reply-to: <6d741b990804301749x247b4bd1s793e50cf15834828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <cf0c2a990804291328yd9a1d47nb3bd0dd83e15b961@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990804292039p279964dbn1e964afcde21605b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990804300553u73e403c7x9d2d86db41d90930@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990804301517x56c22666yfa3342408eed8936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <cf0c2a990804301731r46bfe63dp7174569696f51abe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990804301749x247b4bd1s793e50cf15834828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  The essence of your proposal is to replace hurried votes with tweaks. Now,
>  if you proposed only tweaks, then a separate proposal by another player that
>  removed hurried votes would be okay.

Removing hurried proposals was an afterthought.

Honestly Tweaks aren't as powerful and probably aren't a great
one-for-one replacement, since they require unanimous consent rather
than just a simple majority vote, but Hurried Proposals are a pain.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: not so peculiar
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: not so peculiar
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread