Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

Ed Murphy on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:59:59 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:22:49 -0800
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650802051746m4e5c5c1dje82e3b7a4f5e8a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <169695.7652.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802051302q252c6beekc04fc5885c10eebe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0802051424x28dbcfafj76ae549a8104e584@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990802051506l5995a505i5e61717198fd57b0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802051604tc355c76rce24173cce98d784@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990802051645r5e03a7cfw84e86bdd8e39c077@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802051746m4e5c5c1dje82e3b7a4f5e8a6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

Billy Pilgrim wrote:

> The goal of including the block of text bit (as a
> comment, oops) was just to prevent people working around the restriction on
> naming rule 4e41 by refering to its section.

"alludes to" is also necessary, otherwise it could be trivially
worked around by proposing e.g. "Repeal all rules except for 4E1
through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100".
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Mike McGann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread