Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

0x44 wrote:

> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Jan 19, 2008 1:22 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>   
>>> I hereby charge Codae with a Misdemeanor offense under Rule 59. I
>>> submit the following Consutlation:
>>>
>>> {{
>>> Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 59 for not updating the Public
>>> Display for the Ministry of Questions?
>>>
>>> Unbeliever: Codae
>>> }}
>>>
>>> Reasoning:
>>> Rule 18 states that the Oracle is responsible for maintaining a Public
>>> Display of the current Consultations. I interpret this to be an
>>> obligation of the Ministry, and a Minister shall fulfill any
>>> obligations as stated in Rule 53 which makes him liable under Rule 59.
>>> I bring this case forward, not because the duties were not performed
>>> in error or confusion, but because he willingly ducked these
>>> responsibilities as an "experiment". I recommend the maximum fine of
>>> m50, one point on his license, and two minutes in the penalty box.
>>>
>>>     
> I answer this consultation NO. Rule 4e59 declares that spamming the fora 
> is a crime punishable by a maximum fine of 100m and any points they 
> would have received during the nweek.

Huh?  *checks rules*  Oh.

I submit the following Consultation:

       Is Codae guilty of violating Rule 4E56 for not updating the
       Public Display for the Ministry of Questions?

Unbeliever:  Codae

Reasoning:

I refer to BobTHJ's reasoning in his similar Consultation, except
that he mistakenly specified Rule 59 instead of Rule 56 (as well as
generally omitting 4E prefixes).

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss