Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

Mike McGann on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:04:00 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:03:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <4794A11D.5000805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990801191222q54bc6081h77dd7d9d7e396a92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0801202145o3e6a6046mdc449fb76e60aa23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4794A01E.6040002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4794A11D.5000805@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 21, 2008 8:41 AM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Further, had you specified rule 4e54, I would have answered YES.

Oops. I meant to say Rule 56. Oh well.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] ooh, shelve, i like it
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions update
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Criminal Case
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread