Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions

0x44 on Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:09:22 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 12:09:05 -0600
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0801171000p12e02675rdb910eb2e2057b88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <56732cfd0801171000p12e02675rdb910eb2e2057b88@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)

Roger Hicks wrote:
> FYI, I am traversing the archives in an effort to reconstruct the
> obligations of the Ministry of Questions since the beginning of 136. I
> will also be bringing the public display up to date in the process.
> When I am complete, I should know exactly which actions Codae took
> were valid and which were not
Maybe we ought to just duck-type the actions he took. He acted like the
MoQ, he sounded like the MoQ, therefore he was the MoQ and the actions
he took as MoQ were valid.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Kind-hearted usurping
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] A hard time in the practice yard.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ministry of Questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread