Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal

Mike McGann on Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:40:44 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:40:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <7db5cba20801111419r11cf4727r27812e0aabbe0df7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <33dd05c30801111308n132dd6a2t97942e4a42a774b1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20801111334p1ca08639x4ae78c75e03e6912@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <33dd05c30801111403v4fcc28d0iab51f55a46818893@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7db5cba20801111419r11cf4727r27812e0aabbe0df7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I really think we should stick to things operating on an nweekly basis
to simplify accounting and even refactor existing devices to do that
as well. If not, it will be too easy to create complex mechanics that
are difficult to track.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
  - From: Aaron Coquet

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
  - From: ihope
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
  - From: ihope

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [MoC] Voting Results for nweek 136
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Vacating Ministry of Law
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Device proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread