Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 1, 2008 7:10 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 2008 7:00 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > I think this is a perfect example of Oracularity use. It is obvious
> > that the intent was for the maximum HP to be 10. This Oracularity is
> > simply fixing the rule to better state what it originally intended.
> > <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss>
>
>
> I don't see how the intent is obvious. We are creating our own abstract
> system, there is no indication that maximum HPs were desired.

It seems pretty obvious that the intent wasn't to give everyone a
maximum of 10 except those who actually got wounded.  That would be
counterintuituve and stupid.


-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss