Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

Mike McGann on Tue, 1 Jan 2008 17:10:07 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 19:10:03 -0500
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0801011600n49c1e8b9ha477c51654639252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <337830.60104.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990801011357n4a57d4c2w17ad966af7812b25@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0801011600n49c1e8b9ha477c51654639252@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 1, 2008 7:00 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> I think this is a perfect example of Oracularity use. It is obvious
> that the intent was for the maximum HP to be 10. This Oracularity is
> simply fixing the rule to better state what it originally intended.
> <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss>

I don't see how the intent is obvious. We are creating our own abstract
system, there is no indication that maximum HPs were desired.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: I, for one, am NOT going on a zombie hunt!
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal: I, for one, am NOT going on a zombie hunt!
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Did the s**m work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread