Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamble Votes

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/31/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Dec 31, 2007 2:13 AM, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > so, on a 5 or a 6, that vote counts as... what? no vote? roll again?
> >
> >
> On 5 or 6 it is a vote of GAMBLE, which has no effect upon a
> proposal's strength.


I see how that would work (the word GAMBLE just being ignored) but I think
you should specify explicitly that a 5 or 6 also leads to ABSTAIN plus a
change in vote power.

Another issue: the placement of these words in the rule does ensure that all
gambles are decided before votes are tallied, right? i.e. if the tenth
proposal of the nweek is one i have decided to gamble on and roll a 6, then
my vote power is decreased by 1 on all of that nweek's proposals (even the
first nine), right?

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss