Re: [s-d] Why are points Game Objects?

["Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>]

Now a better question is what's the purpose of having a distinction
between Attributes and Properties.

I'm considering a proposal that will completely refactor the Objects
system.  Perhaps I'll get around to drafting it this nweek.

On Dec 30, 2007 6:28 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2007 6:10 PM, ihope <ihope127@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, but the rule says "Points are Game Objects", implying that an
> > individual point is a Game Object.
> > <http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss>
> >
>
> I went digging through the archives. Attributes and Points were both enacted
> in the first nweek in the 3rd era:
>
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/archives/spoon-business/spoon-business-200612/msg00001.html
>
> http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Proposals/0009
> http://b.nomic.net/index.php/Proposals/0012
>
> I guess that is why Points are not Attributes?
>
> - Hose
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss