Re: [s-d] Question about Hurrying

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Some players may feel that the proposal should be voted on sooner but
simultaneously may not be in favor of it themselves. This isn't a problem
for most of the things being hurried right now as these are not very
controversial issues. Another issue is that there may very well be more
players voting than are currently active, and this would leave the against
voters out in the cold.

As a NOTE TO ALL: We currently have 3 proposals on the table that are meant
to be hurried. They are there to fix things that are broken (I broke most of
them)...

Quorum Minus One is 5, right now, and this is how much support hurrying
needs.

Mr. Fixit (BobTHJ) has garnered 3 support.
Mr. Fixit 2 (Billy Pilgrim) has garnered 2 support.
Rules text mistakenly removed? Proposal to add it back (Ivan Hope) has
garnered 3 support.

We need 2-3 more support for each hurry.

Billy Pilgrim


Billy Pilgrim

On Dec 30, 2007 1:00 AM, Mike McGann < mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Question: Hurrying requires Quorum - 1 to get a vote, but at that point
> you
> almost have a majority. Why not just require a majority of support and
> then
> simply pass the proposal without an additional voting period?
>
> - Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss