Re: [s-d] [s-b] [MoC] Voting Results for nweek 135

[Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Billy Pilgrim wrote:

> Actually, I'm pretty sure the points are messed across the board. Points for
> proposals that pass and go down historically as won are awarded on the basis
> of 2X number of FOR votes (by Players (regardless of vote power) and not by
> other Outsiders such as factions), not on the basis of 2X strength. The -3's
> are ok.

I've updated the subsidiary player pages per the original point
awards.  I don't have the energy to wrap my head around this issue,
nor around Ministerial salaries (due to confusion over who held
which ones at which times); if someone can summarize those, I'll
get the relevant pages updated as well.

I've also updated the subsidiary pages to reflect Wooble's non-forfeit
(per Consultation 72), and metaloop and Ivan Hope joining.  I don't
think there are any points of controversy on any of those, are there?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss