Re: [s-d] [s-b] Ballot for nweek 135

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nope, it was ttpf. I almost submitted the same message earlier till I
realized McGee's email used that sneaky "discussion list for B Nomic
<spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>" trick.

On Dec 25, 2007 10:42 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> nttpf.
>
> Also, the proposal does not take any actions.  Or maybe it does.  Anyway, it effects no changes to the rules.
>
> Codae
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Adam Hill <adamahill@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2007 10:20:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Ballot for nweek 135
>
> Thanks for the clarification. I somehow missed that change in the
> refresh. I change my vote on Proposal 237 to FOR.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Anything McGee
>
>
> On Dec 25, 2007 9:15 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The Registrar does not currently have the liberty to reject any
> > requests. That power was stripped from the registrar in the Emergency
> > before last, and replaced with the general ability of any player to
> > contest another player's registration within 12ndays. My proposal
> > prevents a player from registering taking an action and immediately
> > forfeiting.
> >
> > --
> > --
> > 0x44;
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss