Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Action: Dictatorship of the Proletariat or quick fix to the Emergency.

["William Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> William Berard wrote:
> > On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> comex wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> It's actually unambiguous. If a majority of PEPs believe that Rule 1-10
> >>>> self-ratifies to fix itself, then it did. We can get on with the game.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I would not proceed with a gamestate unless it was sufficiently
> >>> unambiguous that nearly everyone agrees that it is correct.  However,
> >>> I would not be surprised in this case if you had several objectors.
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> spoon-discuss mailing list
> >>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >>>
> >>>
> >> There haven't been any objectors since I illegally took the action of
> >> revising the rule.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > The problem is Agora's child did sumbit a similar illegal-but-accepted
> > tweak. which one is going to really happen then?
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
> My illegal action preceded Agora's Child's action by eight minutes.

Which means that (althouth that is irrelevant now that somone
objected), it would technically be Agora's Child action that ends up
altering the rule :

Your action happens first, changing rule 1-10 to (new version of rule 1-10)
then AC's action happens, targettign a specific body of text in 1-10
that may, or may not, still be there. ( I haven't checked...)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss