Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Action: Dictatorship of the Proletariat or quick fix to the Emergency.

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

William Berard wrote:
> On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> comex wrote:
>>     
>>> On 12/12/07, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> It's actually unambiguous. If a majority of PEPs believe that Rule 1-10
>>>> self-ratifies to fix itself, then it did. We can get on with the game.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I would not proceed with a gamestate unless it was sufficiently
>>> unambiguous that nearly everyone agrees that it is correct.  However,
>>> I would not be surprised in this case if you had several objectors.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>>>
>>>       
>> There haven't been any objectors since I illegally took the action of
>> revising the rule.
>>
>>     
>
>
> The problem is Agora's child did sumbit a similar illegal-but-accepted
> tweak. which one is going to really happen then?
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   
My illegal action preceded Agora's Child's action by eight minutes.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss