| Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:46:14 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's refresh proto v1.2 |
On Dec 11, 2007 2:40 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > False dilemma. My suggested interpretation of 1-10, while not making > an action invalid, /would/ stop it from becoming automatically valid > (its validity would then need to be evaluated via consultation). On > the other hand, my refresh proto would repeal both parts of this > mechanism (leaving it to subsequent regular proposals to replace them > with a more workable system). Right, OK, I just reread that. Good indeed. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss