Re: [s-d] Not a Proposal: Dependence Day

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 10, 2007 10:11 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Perhaps: "that the Rules require to be performed 'without M supporters'
> or 'without N objections'", but then you run into the whole
> requiring-literal-text problem.
>

I think that would work without the quotes in this way:

A Game Action that the Rules require to be performed with M supporters
and/or to be performed without N objections is a Dependent Action.

Tweaks at least need to be performable when the Clock is Off.  For other
> actions I can see why ndays would be preferable.
>

True. I like.

As a "thing for later" maybe we should limit the actions that can be
performed when the Clock is Off. We could use the clock as control rods if a
meltdown is approaching without requiring a full blown emergency.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss