Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:54:58 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.


On Dec 10, 2007 2:23 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Dec 10, 2007 12:02 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I say it time for the Fourth Era of B Nomic and a Great Reset of nweek
> 134
> > or 135. Viva la revolution (and Las Vegas)!
> >
> I personally would like to see our current ruleset work. Just because
> there were issues with my refresh proposal doesn't mean that overall
> the concept can't work. I take responsibility for not defining things
> more clearly, and I move to fix the bugs in the current system rather
> than start over from scratch.
>
> BobTHJ


I support that. We can iron out some of the bugs that have come up recently
without having to wipe everything. It would be a shame to lose some of the
neat framework that already exists.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss