Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.

Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:53:07 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
From: "Geoffrey Spear" <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:53:01 -0500
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0712100948m5bdcff68u1be6113258b582a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <A54306DF-FCFF-4117-A424-6BB0C15558FC@xxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0712100948m5bdcff68u1be6113258b582a8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Dec 10, 2007 12:48 PM, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:56 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > "Pressing", "activating", "switching", and "pushing" aren't Game
> > Actions and don't have any effect.
> >
> I think we should accept these as reasonable synonyms. We don't
> require exact terminology for taking any other actions, why this one?
> It would also make things far simpler than attempting to reconstruct
> the past two weeks of game history.

A Refresh Proposal adopted during the next Pause could easily ratify
the last 2 weeks of game history while at the same time providing for
a less insane future.

-- 
Geoffrey Spear
http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Panic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] We didn't panic then, so we have to panic now.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread