Re: [s-d] Transclusion and History don't mix

["Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>]

Go ahead and change all the numbers now and if anyone has any references to
a rule number, there is plenty of time to revise proposals. And BobTHJ's
proposal could be revised to eliminate the funky end of nweek batch process.

- Hose

On Dec 9, 2007 10:59 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Well, Rule 1-8 would actually allow the renumbering to be done
> unilaterally by the MoL, which, if done early enough in the nweek to
> give proposals a chance to change what rules they're trying to amend,
> would actually be incredibly less ugly than having a passed proposal
> change them in the middle of processing all of the other proposals.  I
> think if BobTHJ's proposal hadn't failed quorum it would have caused
> all of the proposals that came after it and passed to have no effect.
>
> In fact, since it's still Pending and Quorum for this nweek will be
> drastically decreased, it'd probably be wise for anyone submitting
> Proposals this week to avoid referring to rules they're amending by
> number.
>
> On Dec 9, 2007 10:15 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This is good reason to vote for or to refine BobTHJ's sequential rule
> number
> > proposal:
> >
> > (see Rule 1-17 on 1-Oct-2007)
> >
> > http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Rules&oldid=2995
> >
> > - Hose
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Geoffrey Spear
> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss