Re: [s-d] [s-b] Some Game Actions

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I've updated the wiki to reflect the zotting of Consultations 59,60,61, 
and 62, and waiting Consultation 63.

--
0x44;



Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2007 6:39 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>> To answer your questions:
>>
>> <this question is a sentence fragment and thus has no answer>
>>
>> Mine
>>
>> I don't know.  If it is legal to transfer Panic Buttons, I have not.
>>  Otherwise, I have.
>>
>> I also submit the following Consultations:
>>
>> {
>> I write "X" on my Panic Button. is valid.
>> }
>>
>> {
>> I give my Panic Button to Goethe. is valid.
>> }
>>
>> {
>> I give my Panic Button to Wonko. is valid.
>> }
>>
>> {
>> I press pikhq's Panic Button, turning it On. is valid.
>> }
>>
>> {
>> Question:  Should the above Consultations, based on the Rules, be ZOTTED?
>> Reasoning:  The format is explicitly condoned in Rule 1-10, but the format
>> also appears malformed (to the Supplicant).
>> Unbeliever: BobTHJ
>> }
>>
>>     
>
> The above Consultations are, with ascending Consultation Numbers from Top to
> Bottom of Codae's message, Consultations Number 59 to 63.
>
> As MoQ, I ZOT Consultations Number 59, 60, 61, and 62. Reasoning, which
> applies to each ZOTTING: This consultation is malformed because it contains
> ungrammatical sentence fragments.
>
> I assign Consultation Number 63 to Priest *Hose*. Despite the fact that the
> specific consultations referred to above have already been ZOTTED, the
> question in itself could apply to future cases.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss