Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 7 Dec 2007 04:06:02 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Some Game Actions


On Dec 6, 2007 6:39 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> To answer your questions:
>
> <this question is a sentence fragment and thus has no answer>
>
> Mine
>
> I don't know.  If it is legal to transfer Panic Buttons, I have not.
>  Otherwise, I have.
>
> I also submit the following Consultations:
>
> {
> I write "X" on my Panic Button. is valid.
> }
>
> {
> I give my Panic Button to Goethe. is valid.
> }
>
> {
> I give my Panic Button to Wonko. is valid.
> }
>
> {
> I press pikhq's Panic Button, turning it On. is valid.
> }
>
> {
> Question:  Should the above Consultations, based on the Rules, be ZOTTED?
> Reasoning:  The format is explicitly condoned in Rule 1-10, but the format
> also appears malformed (to the Supplicant).
> Unbeliever: BobTHJ
> }
>

The above Consultations are, with ascending Consultation Numbers from Top to
Bottom of Codae's message, Consultations Number 59 to 63.

As MoQ, I ZOT Consultations Number 59, 60, 61, and 62. Reasoning, which
applies to each ZOTTING: This consultation is malformed because it contains
ungrammatical sentence fragments.

I assign Consultation Number 63 to Priest *Hose*. Despite the fact that the
specific consultations referred to above have already been ZOTTED, the
question in itself could apply to future cases.

Billy Pilgrim
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss