Re: [s-d] [s-b] Sane Partnerships

[Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 03 December 2007 19:22:25 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 8:24 PM, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > With 3 support, all Nonhuman Registered Voters may be restricted from
> > voting
> > on a proposal.
> 
> 
> How about replacing all by any in this sentence? Leaves less ambiguity for
> allowing one NRV to vote on a proposal while not allowing another. Unless
> your intention was all or nothing..
> 
> Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> 

The intention *was* an all or nothing. . . Trying to do something remotely 
similar to Agora's democratic votes (in its treatment of partnerships), 
without adding a few pages of rules.

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss