Re: [s-d] [s-b] Speedy Emergencies.

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Speaking of being careful not to reference concepts and objects created
in other rules, shouldn't the current value of the Pause be documented
publicly somewhere?


Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2007 2:52 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> Amend rule 0 clause 4 to read:
>> {{
>>     4. The Emergency Coordinator makes a statement to the Emergency
>> Forum that he is initializing the Pause. The Procedure tracks time spent
>> using the Pause. When the Emergency Coordinator initializes the Pause it
>> is zero. Thereafter, until the completion of the Procedure, the Pause is
>> increased by one each day at 00:00:00 UTC. Once per ndelay, with support
>> from a quorum of active PEPs, the Emergency Coordinator may increment
>> the value of the Pause by one.
>> }}
>>     
>
> I don't know if you should reference ndelays in this. The emergency
> rule is very careful to not make reference to concepts and objects
> created in other rules so that it does not become dependent upon them
> for function. The same goes for the terms "support" and "active". I
> would suggest wording it "At any time, the Emergency Coordinator may
> announce to the Emergency Forum their intention to increment the
> pause. If no player voices objection to this action on the Emergency
> Forum within 24 hours, then the value of the Pause is incremented by
> 1."
>
> BobTHJ
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss