Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal

Mike McGann on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 06:37:57 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:37:52 -0500
In-reply-to: <474BAAB2.7040303@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990711262047v23136978gf0dbb4aabd8f992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <474BAAB2.7040303@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Nov 27, 2007 12:27 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I suggest removing the first clause.  It makes the second clause
> ambiguous, and the second clause resets the Clock anyway.

I'll amend with that suggestion. I guess it should also say, "the
beginning of nday 1..."

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Casual Query
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread