Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal

Mike McGann on Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:53:36 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:53:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <474BA1C0.6070107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6d741b990711262047v23136978gf0dbb4aabd8f992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <474BA1C0.6070107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Nov 26, 2007 11:49 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can this go down as the only war never declared which was simultaneously
> lost by both sides?

I guess that makes it a "conflict" instead of a "war"?

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Hose's Refresh Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread