Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Dice Server a Player?, Proposal: Dice Server Revocation

["Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>]

Y'all need to start using the Unbeliever mechanism. Until then, I will
punish you.

This is Consultation Number 53, which I assign to Priest Wooble.

MoQ Billy Pilgrim

On Nov 26, 2007 9:23 AM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I submit the following Consultation:
>
> {{
> Is "Dice Server" a Player?
>
> Reasoning:
> It is capable of passing a Membership Test (it is able to send an
> email and receive a reply to an email (even though it goes into a
> rarely read mailbox)), It is currently not a Player, and it has a
> working email address. Therefore, as soon as the request was received
> by the Public Forum, it became a Player. Once a Player, the Registrar
> does not have to authority to revoke playerhood as determined by
> Consultation 51 if Pondered.
> }}
>
> I submit the following Proposal titled, "Dice Server Revocation":
>
> {{
> Any Player named "Dice Server" shall cease to be a Player.
> }}
>
> - Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss