Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 52

[0x4461736864617368 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Incorrect. The assumption isn't that a Game Object cannot be an external 
force, but that a Faction cannot.

--
0x4461736864617368;



Daniel Lepage wrote:
> I claim this INCONSISTENT. This ruling is based on the assumption that  
> no Game Object can be an External Force. This is in flat contradiction  
> with the rules: by Rule 1-3, every Outsider, and thus every Player, is  
> an External Force by definition.
>
> Were the game to end, the AFO would indeed cease to be a Faction, but  
> the AFO itself would persist, and this is the only requirement for  
> being an External Force.
>
> On a related note, I call for Consultation 42 to be ZOTTed, on the  
> grounds that too many other Consultations address the same issue and I  
> do not wish to introduce inconsistencies.
>
> For reference, C42 was BobTHJ's question: The AFO is both a Player and  
> a Faction at the same time, true or false?
>
>   
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss