Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation 47

["William Berard" <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/26/07, Josiah Worcester <josiahw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 25 November 2007 09:08:41 Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > > {{
> > > Does a device (unique or not) need a corresponding, existing blueprint
>
> > > to be defined?
> > > }}
> > >
> >
> > This is Consultation Number 47 and I assign it to Priest pikhq.
> >
> > Billy Pilgrim
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> By rule 3-12, a device must be defined, and a blueprint may be used to
> define
> it. However, it does not say that only a blueprint may define a device.
> So,
> anything that defines a device needs to be attached to a device, but this
> need not be a blueprint.
>
> So, I answer consultation 47 NO.



Could you elaborate (informally) on "anything that defines a device needs to
be attached to a device". What does "attached to a device" means? Plus do
you mean, sating that "anything that defines a device..." that devices are
to be defined by an object, as opposed to a Player? (this is also the object
of consultation 45, really.)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss