Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:30:39 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Right to fair judicial review


Agreed.

Billy Pilgrim


On 11/22/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I submit the following proposal:
>
> Right to Fair Judicial Review
> {
> Amend rule 2-5 Judgment by replacing:
> {{
> Any player may as a Game Action submit a Consultation.
> }}
> with
> {{
> Any External Force may as a Game Action submit a Consultation.
> }}
> }
>
> Just because someone/something is denied playerhood should not prevent
> them from submitting consultations to clarify the ambiguities in the
> rules. Especially since there is a considerable amount of ambiguity
> surrounding the rules that pertain to becoming a player.
>
> BobTHJ
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss