| Mike McGann on Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:44:58 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] My votes (finally!) |
On Nov 14, 2007 11:29 AM, Daniel Lepage <dplepage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 177: Proper Notification (Hose) > Against. Proposals that use "shall" like this have no effect. Are you saying that since it doesn't change any game state, the net result of this passing would be nothing? I guess the correct way would have been to create a rule that self-repealed after doing what was intended? But then again, I don't think there is anything preventing the Ambassador from doing it anyway. - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss