Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17

Antonio Dolcetta on Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:23:15 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17
From: Antonio Dolcetta <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:23:47 +0200
In-reply-to: <56732cfd0706220814l25e2131aqbbdb24c208086bda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <396109.61542.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0706212000q56442695k2ccb1845da1a0736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <467B8B99.4020800@xxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0706220814l25e2131aqbbdb24c208086bda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509)

Roger Hicks wrote:

> 
> I'm also looking for one more claim of inconsistency on 5, 7, and 10,
> which I ruled incorrectly on. It appears I have completely failed as a
> Priest. :(
> 
> BobTHJ

I think you did fine, I never understood exactly what they were about.



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17
  - From: Roger Hicks
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17
  - From: Roger Hicks

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] DIS: Extending the call
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Oracle Report 22/06/07
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] consultation 17
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread