Re: [s-d] designation

comex on Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:35:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] designation

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] designation
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:34:53 -0500
In-reply-to: <F3F56A35-49CC-498F-A80C-F4A305BD5548@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <200702261150.02988.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400702260905k4faa94eax97e30c80142e2125@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F3F56A35-49CC-498F-A80C-F4A305BD5548@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.9.5

I would argue the point, but doing that before I'm finished scamming would be 
rather defeatist.

Attachment: pgpvKARyNyMFx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] designation
  - From: shadowfirebird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] designation
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] designation
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] designation
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] designation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread