Re: [s-d] [s-b] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003

shadowfirebird on Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:03:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003
From: shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 11:02:56 +0000
In-reply-to: <45D02DDD.6060704@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <mailbox-4619-1170926833-325260@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <uk5yqimju.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2f4350400702100215w222a004fu5bfb0ef80c13c328@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200702101123.21812.comexk@xxxxxxxxx> <45D02DDD.6060704@xxxxxxxxx>

Seems to me that you need to give the admin first refusal somehow.  Or the
panic procedure could become a way to start a power play.

How about "If after 5 ndays or ndelays the administrator has not
responded..."


-- 
A polar bear is just a rectangular bear after a co-ordinate transform...
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003
  - From: Peter Cooper Jr.
- Re: [s-d] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003
  - From: shadowfirebird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003
  - From: Antonio Dolcetta

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] automatic priest reselection for Consultation 003
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] panic
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread