Re: [s-d] Crazy Eddie's Dead

[shadowfirebird@xxxxxxxxx]

> Well, I'm new to nomics, but it seems to me that rule-tag as it stands
> is not a game of... how shall I put it... great strategical depth.
> Crazy Eddie would add more complexity to it, which is why I'd be
> inclined to back an amended Crazy Eddie proposal in the next round.
>
> However, as Antonio said, it would add to the burdens of the
> Administrator. I'm not sure how you guys usually handle balancing eir
> duties. Though we could have a probationary period, to see how it
> works out.

Well, first off, only half the devices I proposed have anything to do
with rule tag.

Second, Crazy Eddie doesn't have to be the Administrator.  It seems to
me that there is somewhat of an advantage for the player who gets the
post, in fact.


What changes would people want to see in a revised shop proposal?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss