shadowfirebird on Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:05:07 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] time defs proposal


> Basically the problem is that everything we have is defined as starting
> on nday X, or has to be done before the end of nday Y etc.
> But nowhere is it actually explained when ndays start and end, or even
> what and nday actually is.
> What we have is just a number called nday that changes semi-regularly.

Hmm.  Personally I don't think that there is any lack of clarity.  If
I say "On nday 9" then there is only one possible interpretation of
that - I mean on the UTC day when nday = 9.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss